[Standards-JIG] JEP-45 MUC - Possible name conflict

JD Conley jconley at winfessor.com
Mon Oct 11 16:51:44 UTC 2004


I would say a conflict error with different text.  :)  It's still a
conflict, just a different kind.

JD


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gaston Dombiak [mailto:dombiak_gaston at hotmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 12:22 PM
> To: standards-jig at jabber.org
> Subject: [Standards-JIG] JEP-45 MUC - Possible name conflict
> 
> The room configuration form allows to change the name of an existing
room.
> Therefore, it's possible that the submitted form specifies a new name
for
> the room which collides with another (existing) room that is already
using
> the new name. Furthermore, the existing room may be a persistent room
that
> at the moment of the submission was not in memory since it was empty
(no
> occupants).
> 
> My question is which error code should be returned when a name
conflict of
> this kind happens? A conflict error initially seemed fine to me but
the
> problem is that that error code is already been used to specify that
the
> room can't stay without owners. The latter is possible when the
submitted
> configuration form does not contain any owner.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>   -- Gato
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig





More information about the Standards mailing list