[Standards-JIG] Groupchat using original jid's
gyldenskjold at mail.dk
Mon Oct 25 19:27:45 UTC 2004
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 20:54, Rachel Blackman wrote:
> > Is there a standard for groupchat, where the group isn't administrated
> > by the server or where the original jids are used?
> MU-C in a non-anonymous room includes the real JIDs in the presence
> packets. It is therefore possible to map the room-resource format
> nicknames to the real JID.
Hmmm... Ok. I haven't heard of the MU-C before. I have looked at
jep-0045. To me it seems, that the server administrates this group,
hence it could, if compromised, send the wrong JID's to the users.
Thereby I had to trust the server, to be sure to get the right JIDs,
What I was looking for, was something where the client was an
administrator and the server, was a dummy forwarding packages. Then I
could digatally sign the messages and the user JIDs. I hope I am making
my self clear.
Am I all wrong? Is there a standard supporting this?
Jens Mikkelsen <gyldenskjold at mail.dk>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Standards