[Standards-JIG] Re: Discovering of less concrete features
stpeter at jabber.org
Thu Oct 28 20:35:24 UTC 2004
<200410271601.47435.justin-keyword-jabber.093179 at affinix.com>,
Justin Karneges <justin-keyword-jabber.093179 at affinix.com> wrote:
> If you consider that you need an XMPP connection to in order to perform
> service discovery, then checking for SRV or IPv6 support over this connection
> seems minimally useful. At best it could facilitate the collection of
> statistics. Checking for in-protocol things like stringprep is redundant,
> since xmpp-core requires this. It's bad enough that clients have to support
> non-1.0 and 1.0, it would be worse if there were a bunch of 1.0 variations.
It might also help me find a server that might be more useful to me.
> Now, offline message support might be nice to know. Ditto for message
> archiving, although we do have a namespace for that already in JEP-0136.
For support of that protocol specifically, yes. But what if I want to
know if the person I'm chatting with logs conversations in any format
(maybe messages go into a database or whatever)?
More information about the Standards