[Standards-JIG] Re: Proposal for a solution to transport rosters

maqi at jabberstudio.org maqi at jabberstudio.org
Mon Sep 6 12:24:57 UTC 2004

On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Richard Dobson wrote:

> Just because the clients might be able to be updated and deployed more
> quickly doesnt mean it is the right place to put this logic.

I second.

> As far as servers being updated goes I would think that in actuality if
> a new version of the servers and transports came out tommorrow with this
> functionaility that server admins would deploy it quite quickly, they
> already have to keep updating their transports to keep them working,

Many server administrators just don't care:
48x jabberd
46x jabberd 1.4
27x jabberd 1.4.3
So, about half of the public servers (in this list) are running outdated


More information about the Standards mailing list