[Standards-JIG] Re: JEP-0054 vcard email definition is inconsistent

Jacek Konieczny jajcus at bnet.pl
Wed Sep 15 09:16:17 UTC 2004

On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 02:29:28PM +1000, trejkaz at xaoza.net wrote:
> At Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 09:50:08PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > Actually, I think we'd want to use the same protocol for describing 
> > things other than persons, too: chatrooms, servers, bots, and a whole 
> > range of other entities on the network. But I agree that we'd probably 
> > need only one element at a time.
> That would be neat.  FOAF at present as far as I've found is very tied to
> the personal level (as you would expect, though.)  So I bet we would be
> inventing new entities for servers, services and bots.  Chatrooms might
> work as a foaf:Group though...

Why limit ourself to FOAF. Use RDF and FOAF just as the vocabulary to
describe persons. RDF can be used to describe anything. And there are
a lot of vocabularies already defined.


More information about the Standards mailing list