[Standards-JIG] RE: PubSub URI
trejkaz at xaoza.net
Tue Sep 28 22:16:00 UTC 2004
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:11, Nolan Eakins wrote:
> This could put the 1024 byte limit on the URIs in danger, but do we need to
> limit the size?
Jabber IDs are already theoretically three times the size of a URI anyway.
Keeping the node short would be considered just like keeping the JID short...
a good idea, and required if you wanted a URI representation of the node. :-)
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:28, Justin Karneges wrote:
> Just to throw something out here: notice how it is 'mailto', and not
> 'smtp' ?
> Maybe our URIs should have more of a command focus instead of a protocol
> focus, especially since XMPP can technically be used for anything. After
> all, once XMPP replaces email, won't we still use 'mailto' ?
I like it. chatto: for chats? subscribeto: for adding users?
But hang on. During the phase where XMPP is replacing email, is
mailto:trejkaz at xaoza.net a Jabber ID or an email address?
Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <trejkaz at xaoza.net>
Web site: http://xaoza.net/trejkaz/
Jabber ID: trejkaz at jabber.xaoza.net
GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Standards