[Standards-JIG] Re: What happened to the ACK proposal?

Sander Devrieze s.devrieze at pandora.be
Mon Aug 15 21:34:36 UTC 2005

Op maandag 15 augustus 2005 19:51, schreef Stephen Marquard:
> Sure, TCP could be a better protocol, but that's not a reason for not
> addressing the undesired behaviour at the XMPP level (via a feature which
> can be negotiated during stream initiation).
> Lastly, if it's something that should get fixed in XMPP, why not have an
> experimental JEP which client and server authors can implement to
> demonstrate the best solution for XMPP so that when it gets to the IETF
> there's some actual experience?

What about "JEP-0079: Advanced Message 
Processing" (http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0079.html)?


Mvg, Sander Devrieze.

xmpp:sander at devrieze.dyndns.org ( http://jabber.tk/ )

More information about the Standards mailing list