[Standards-JIG] Re: privacy2 anti-SPIM proto-JEP
ian.paterson at clientside.co.uk
Wed Aug 31 18:49:22 UTC 2005
> 2005/8/31, Ian Paterson <ian.paterson at clientside.co.uk>:
> > Instead of using the 'subscription' type, you add items to the list
> > with type='group' for each group in your roster. (Or use
> > type='jid' if
> > these roster items are exceptions).
> Wouldn't you agree, that isn't really setting rules via a
> subscription state? I could really not use subscription and
> groups at all. Just add all "jid"s to the rules.
If we need to fix this, let's wait for RFC 3921bis.
More information about the Standards