[Standards-JIG] XMPP URIs was: Two questions regarding JEP-0124HTTP Binding
stpeter at jabber.org
Fri Dec 2 16:07:48 UTC 2005
Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
> The 124 spec mentions that the route attribute should follow the
> syntax as specified in ref 11.
> This reference seems to be MIA (reason mentioned as ref 12 I guess ?).
When you submit a revised version of the same Internet-Draft to the
IETF, they remove the old one from their website, resulting in a 404.
Personally I think this is poor webmastering, but you'll have to
complain to the IETF about that. I'll update the reference in JEP-0124.
> JEP 147 which seems to talk about related subject - is it correct to
> assume that this is what is going to be the definition for XMPP URI/IRI ?
The xmpp URI scheme is defined here:
JEP-0147 merely specifies a registry of query components and name-value
pairs to be used in the context of XMPP URIs/IRIs.
> If yes , then I am wondering how 124 , which is a draft standard , could
> depend on an expirimental JEP.
JEP-0124 is right now dependent on an Internet-Draft, which is a work in
progress and is pretty much equivalent to an Experimental JEP. Naturally
that dependency would be removed if we change the syntax of the 'route'
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3641 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards