[Standards-JIG] XHTML-IM content in presence and IQ?
stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Dec 21 22:05:08 UTC 2005
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Ian Paterson wrote:
>>> However, note that right now JEP-0066 has a similar example, which I
>>> think needs to be removed or changed.
>> Yes, well spotted. +1 for completely removing it.
> It'll be on the agenda for the next Council meeting, I guess. ;-)
The example looks like this (URL truncated for readability):
We could (1) delete it or (2) change it to something like this:
<status>gone for a while</status>
IMHO it's including the x:oob data in <status/> that's evil. I don't
have strong objections to including it as a child of <presence/>.
Jabber Software Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3641 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards