[Standards-JIG] XHTML-IM content in presence and IQ?

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Dec 21 23:30:45 UTC 2005


Ian Paterson wrote:
>> We could (1) delete it or (2) change it to something like this:
>>
>> <presence type='unavailable'>
>>    <status>gone for a while</status>
>>    <x xmlns='jabber:x:oob'>
>>      <url>http://www.saint-andre.com/blog/</url>
>>    </x>
>> </presence>
>>
>> IMHO it's including the x:oob data in <status/> that's evil. I don't 
>> have strong objections to including it as a child of <presence/>.
> 
> IMHO if this protocol is not in widespread use then it could be deleted.
> That would simplifiy the JEP and future client implementations.
> 
> Also, examples like this can encourage people to add other payloads to
> presence stanzas (evil unless really necessary). Note, I'm definitely
> not saying we should ban this usage, just that we shouldn't encourage
> it.

OK, I'll accept that argument. :-)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3641 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20051221/556af876/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list