[Standards-JIG] Re: Dead participants in MU-conf, JEP-0045
jabber at dsutton.legend.uk.com
Wed Jan 19 01:44:53 UTC 2005
This was the other option and i'm happy with either way - I just wanted something in place.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 05:41:31PM -0800, JD Conley wrote:
> > >> If a bare jid tries to join a room with the same nick name they
> > >> already
> > >> have, the service should kick out the older occupant with a
> > >> conflict error and allow in the new one.
> > >
> > > What if I want to be in the same room with 2 different nicks? (and
> > > think not just people chatting, but m2m applications as well). I'd
> > > what you suggest is implementation specific at most.
> > Then you're not a bare JID trying to join a room with the *SAME* nick
> > name they already have, as was the original proposal. ;)
> > If sparks at jabber.org attempts to join jdev with nick 'Sparks' and then
> > sparks at jabber.org attempts to join jdev with nick 'CeruleanSparks'
> > those are two different nicks and should be allowed. If
> > sparks at jabber.org attempts to join jdev with nick 'Sparks' and then
> > later sparks at jabber.org attempts to join jdev /again/ with nick
> > 'Sparks' then it should be treated like a resource conflict and the
> > older one should be booted off.
> > At least, I think that's what JD Conley was suggesting?
> Yes, that's what I was suggesting.
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
Email: dsutton at legend.co.uk
Jabber: peregrine at legend.net.uk
More information about the Standards