[Standards-JIG] Re: discoing a bare JID
stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Jan 19 20:48:04 UTC 2005
In article <20050119200340.GB22317 at localhost>,
Ralph Meijer <jabber.org at ralphm.ik.nu> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 08:10:25PM +0200, Stephen Marquard wrote:
> > Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > >What happens when I disco a bare JID (e.g., juliet at example.com)?
> > ...
> > >(2) If I am subscribed to your presence, in response to a disco#items
> > >query I should receive a list of your available resources (actually,
> > >only those with non-negative presence priority).
> > Why only non-negative presence priority ? There was just a long thread
> > about non-negative priorities. As far as I understand it, having a
> > non-negative priority shouldn't affecting sending or receiving presence
> > for that resource.
> This is an interesting point. If an entity needs to be subscribed to one's
> presence to get this information, and itself sent presence, it would already
> have this information because of received presence stanzas, including the
> resources with negative priorities. I think it doesn't really make sense to
> leave those out in the disco#info query.
Ah, probably not. I retract the statement. :-)
More information about the Standards