[Standards-JIG] Re: Ad-hoc Commands and nesting

Matthew A. Miller linuxwolf at outer-planes.net
Mon Jan 24 16:39:52 UTC 2005

Trejkaz wrote:
> My main issue with the JEP-50 spec is that at present, there isn't a way 
> specified to do branches at all.  So what it effectively says is, "every item 
> which comes back from the query is a command."  This is dangerous if someone 
> _does_ put branches in, because any client which took this to be a way to 
> optimise the number of queries they perform, may attempt to execute a node 
> which is not actually a command, but a branch.

If any of the items returned by the node 
"http://jabber.org/protocol/commands" are not "automation/command", it 
is a defect of that implementation.

If the spec is not clear on this, it can be fixed.

-  LW

GOT JABBER™? <http://www.jabber.org/>

More information about the Standards mailing list