[Standards-JIG] Re: Ad-hoc Commands and nesting

Matthew A. Miller linuxwolf at outer-planes.net
Tue Jan 25 12:10:42 UTC 2005


I understand what the primary argument is (and responded to that 
separately).  I'm merely commenting on the "what if" about 
"http://jabber.org/protocol/commands" node having items other than 
"automation/command", which (should) violate JEP-0050.

> He's suggesting adding another type so the commands can be nested. This
> would mean more than just "automation/command".
>

-  LW

GOT JABBER™? <http://www.jabber.org/>



More information about the Standards mailing list