[Standards-JIG] Re: Ad-hoc Commands and nesting
Matthew A. Miller
linuxwolf at outer-planes.net
Tue Jan 25 12:10:42 UTC 2005
I understand what the primary argument is (and responded to that
separately). I'm merely commenting on the "what if" about
"http://jabber.org/protocol/commands" node having items other than
"automation/command", which (should) violate JEP-0050.
> He's suggesting adding another type so the commands can be nested. This
> would mean more than just "automation/command".
GOT JABBER™? <http://www.jabber.org/>
More information about the Standards