[Standards-JIG] Re: JEP-0126: directed presence (was: Re: [ejabberd] privacy rules and invisibility])
stpeter at jabber.org
Fri Jul 29 21:59:59 UTC 2005
Stephen Marquard wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Jacek Konieczny wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 10:36:21AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>> As discussed on the ejabberd list, JEP-0126 is poorly defined (we
>>>> might even need to change RFC 3921 to address this problem). I'm
>>>> looking into how best to fix this...
>>> What about sending <presence type="unavailable"/> ("global" offline)
>>> before setting the privacy lists and sending <presence/> after the lists
>>> are set? That would make the user offline for everyone for a moment, but
>>> the final result would be ok, and most of the "hard work" would be done
>>> by the server.
>> Yes, that works. We just need to change the order of things in the JEP.
> That was the same conclusion Sebastian reached a while ago for Pandion
> (c/f previous URL on this thread), to quote:
Yes, somehow I missed that earlier message.
I'll fix up the JEP before the next Council meeting (August 18) and ask
them to approve the changes.
Jabber Software Foundation
More information about the Standards