[Standards-JIG] Re: JEP-0126: directed presence (was: Re: [ejabberd] privacy rules and invisibility])

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Fri Jul 29 21:59:59 UTC 2005


Stephen Marquard wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
>> Jacek Konieczny wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 10:36:21AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>
>>>> As discussed on the ejabberd list, JEP-0126 is poorly defined (we 
>>>> might even need to change RFC 3921 to address this problem). I'm 
>>>> looking into how best to fix this...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What about sending <presence type="unavailable"/> ("global" offline)
>>> before setting the privacy lists and sending <presence/> after the lists
>>> are set? That would make the user offline for everyone for a moment, but
>>> the final result would be ok, and most of the "hard work" would be done
>>> by the server.
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, that works. We just need to change the order of things in the JEP.
> 
> 
> That was the same conclusion Sebastian reached a while ago for Pandion 
> (c/f previous URL on this thread), to quote:

Yes, somehow I missed that earlier message.

I'll fix up the JEP before the next Council meeting (August 18) and ask 
them to approve the changes.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml


More information about the Standards mailing list