[Standards-JIG] RFC Errata / discrepancy rfc 3920 sec. 4.4. and sec. 8.3. (2)
us at activestocks.de
Fri Mar 18 13:35:16 UTC 2005
while investigating some strange problems together with Matthias we
found a possible discrepancy between RFC 3920 sec. 4.4. and sec. 8.3.
In 4.4. the to Attribute is stated as "SHOULD" , in sec. 8.3. the to
Attribute is states as OPTIONAL.
Is this is a problem in the terming or is this alright ?
More information about the Standards