[Standards-JIG] RFC Errata / discrepancy rfc 3920 sec. 4.4. and sec. 8.3. (2)

Ulrich Staudinger us at activestocks.de
Fri Mar 18 13:35:16 UTC 2005


while investigating some strange problems together with Matthias we 
found a possible discrepancy between RFC 3920 sec. 4.4.  and sec. 8.3.

In 4.4. the  to Attribute is stated as "SHOULD" , in sec. 8.3. the to 
Attribute is states as OPTIONAL.

Is this is a problem in the terming or is this alright ?


More information about the Standards mailing list