[Standards-JIG] UPDATED: JEP-0084 (User Avatars)
wolf at bluehands.de
Wed Mar 30 08:42:41 UTC 2005
>A two tag names in different namespaces are two _different_ tag names,
>even if the local name is the same. If you treat tag names independant
>from namespace, then your XML namespace handling is probably broken
>(what when a prefix is defined and used for the namespace?).
As you say, a different namespace makes a different tag. This means that
a different namespace is sufficient to differentiate.
>When we want to reuse a tag, than we should reuse its fully qualified
>name: both local name and namespace. I don't think we need that here.
For the purists: OK, we won't re-use a tag, BECAUSE IT IS A DIFFERENT
TAG, because of the namespace. I don't long for re-using tags per se.
But this is not the point.
My point is that we will get very similar JEPs with almost identical
schemas and examples. I would like to avoid that.
Dr. Klaus H. Wolf
bluehands GmbH & Co.mmunication KG
+49 (0721) 16108 75
Jabber enabled Virtual Presence on the Web: http://www.lluna.de/
Open Source Future History: http://www.galactic-developments.com/
More information about the Standards