[Standards-JIG] reviving JEP-0038: Iconstyles
kevin at kismith.co.uk
Mon May 2 22:39:49 UTC 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 2 May 2005, at 20:28, Hal Rottenberg wrote:
>>> Perhaps there should be two lists of icons. One Informational and the
>>> other Required?
>> I don't see any advantage in making certain emoticons "required" at
>> all. The
>> way I see it, it can only degrade functionality.
> We'll put a SHOULD in the JEP...
After just writing a very long mail *against* a SHOULD in the JEP, I've
deleted it and written another one *for* it. I'm back to against it
again. Sure, we can provide a nice long list in the JEP of emoticons
clients should support but unless we also define an exchange mechanism
for unknown emoticons, it doesn't solve any problems, there'll still be
people out there receiving a message that looks like "I :heart: you
(f)" because the sender happens to have installed that emoticonset, and
we didn't define (f) as a flower in the JEP.
So yes, the problem of what to do when emoticon sets don't match is
worthy of address but no, attempting to define a core, or
all-encompassing set, is not the way of doing it, imo, ymmv, etc etc.
Psi Jabber client maintainer (http://psi.affinix.com/)
Taekwon-do club captain, University of Exeter
Postgraduate Research Student, Computer Science, University Of Exeter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Standards