[Standards-JIG] Re: LAST CALL: JEP-0117 (Intermediate IM Protocol Suite)
sneakin at semanticgap.com
Wed May 18 07:38:03 UTC 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
| On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 04:18:14PM -0400, Hal Rottenberg wrote:
|>On 5/17/05, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote:
|>>Well, I think the default room type is a deployment decision, not
|>>something that we specify in the JEP.
|>But maybe you should put a SHOULD in there?
| Furthermore, if the JEP is going to tell deployers whether a room SHOULD
| be persistent or non-persistent by default, then presumably it is also
| correct for the JEP to weigh in on all the other options (discussion
| logging etc.). But the appropriate settings will depend on the situation
| (public service, private service, logging seen as an invasion of privacy
| on the public Internet, logging required for regulatory compliance in
| some corporate settings, etc.), so I think that's quite out of scope.
| Or so it seems to me.
So are you arguing for bringing all of MUC and its dependencies into the
intermediate suite? :-)
Thinking about it, bringing data forms into the intermediate suite would
be a good thing, especially the MUC use case for approving membership
requests. Go ahead and bring in all of MUC.
- - Nolan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Standards