[Standards-JIG] Re: JEP-4 - Search result with multiple values

Gaston Dombiak gaston at jivesoftware.com
Thu May 19 18:21:55 UTC 2005


Anyone any comment? :)

Thanks,

  -- Gato

"Gaston Dombiak" <gaston at jivesoftware.com> wrote in message 
news:d63b1o$vi7$1 at sea.gmane.org...
> Hey Peter,
>
> Thanks for your answer. I may not be understanding your answer :) but my 
> question was about having many <value> elements in a <field> that is part 
> of an <item>. In the example that I presented you can see that the <item> 
> contains all the fields defined in the <reported> section. However, notice 
> that the second field in the reported section is of type jid-multi so in 
> the <item> element I'm including 2 values in the second field. Is this 
> correct?
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Regards,
>
>  -- Gato
>
>
> "Peter Millard" <pgmillard at gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:cfd3c4d10505131419369ee461 at mail.gmail.com...
> On 5/11/05, Gaston Dombiak <gaston at jivesoftware.com> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Reading JEP-4 I cannot figure out whether it is valid or not to include 
>> many
>> values in a field that is part of an item element. Let me give you an
>> example to clarify what I'm asking here. :)
>>
>>     <x xmlns="jabber:x:data" type="result">
>>       <reported>
>>         <field var="startDate" type="text-single"/>
>>         <field var="agentJIDs" type="jid-multi"/>
>>       </reported>
>>       <item>
>>         <field var="startDate">
>>           <value>20050510T21:15:53</value>
>>         </field>
>>         <field var="agentJIDs">
>>           <value>admin at localhost</value>
>>           <value>demo at localhost</value>
>>         </field>
>>       </item>
>>     </x>
>>
>> So my question is: Is the last field element valid?
>
> No. Re-read section 3.4.. it says:
>
> Each <item/> element defines one item in the result set, and MUST
> contain each field specified in the <reported/> element (although the
> XML character data of the <value/> element MAY be null).
>
> So every item element MUST contain the same fields as described inthe
> reported block.
>
> pgm. 






More information about the Standards mailing list