[Standards-JIG] JEP-0138 (Stream Compression): provisional version1.1
stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Nov 2 20:00:01 UTC 2005
The FORM_TYPE + field name will be unique either way, but if it's easier
for applications to handle separate FORM_TYPEs then I have no objections.
JD Conley wrote:
> It looks pretty good, except I'd say the FORM_TYPE should be
> definable per compression method at the time of submission to the
> registrar and not generically in JEP-0138. The zlib form will be
> different from other methods and I dont think we want one form type
> to rule them all. :)
> -JD Conley
> From: standards-jig-bounces at jabber.org on behalf of Peter Saint-Andre
> Sent: Fri 10/28/2005 2:33 PM To: standards-jig at jabber.org Subject:
> [Standards-JIG] JEP-0138 (Stream Compression): provisional version1.1
> Over the last few days I've read through lots of old messages sent to
> this discussion list, including several related to JEP-0138 (Stream
> Compression). I've attempted to incorporate the list feedback in a
> provisional version 1.1, posted here for review:
> The provisional changelog is: "Added section on optional feature
> negotiation support; mentioned LZW (DCLZ) method; further specified
> error handling."
> Feedback is welcome before I formally submit this version to the
> Jabber Council for consideration.
> -- Peter Saint-Andre Jabber Software Foundation
Jabber Software Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3641 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards