[Standards-JIG] Client Capabilities (rant)

Maciek Niedzielski machekku at miroku.uaznia.net
Sun Nov 20 23:33:14 UTC 2005


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Trejkaz wrote:
>> It's not until we have a roster with multiple users all running the same
>> version of the same client that we start to see a lowering of disco info
>> requests.
> 
> Well, that much is certainly true.  And I've been wondering about this
> caps stuff for quite some time due to this phenomenon.  Sure, a lot of the
> users on my roster use Psi because that's the circle I seemed to end up
> in, but if I casually browse around, I see that some people are on various
> test versions, some are on the previous version, one guy is still on
> 0.9.2, and then there are a few people on Adium, all of whom are on
> different versions of that as well...

Even if you see 10 version of Client ABC in your roster, but all of them
advertise ext 'myext1', this is the same 'myext1'.

Persistent cache was already mentioned, so I'm not going to write about
it again ;)

- --
Maciek
 xmpp:machekku at chrome.pl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1-nr1 (Windows XP)

iD8DBQFDgQe57knNPWzAbeURAu5sAJ4pfOxgFGsH3a74dlK4nOTNCyIWLgCdH5sg
v0nnDJaBKlBq+GQvv1QqDnU=
=XYW7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Standards mailing list