[Standards-JIG] Many to many e2e encryption (JEP-116)

Nolan Eakins sneakin at semanticgap.com
Tue Nov 29 21:50:40 UTC 2005


Justin Karneges wrote:

>On Tuesday 29 November 2005 01:23, Nolan Eakins wrote:
>  
>
>>As Ralph pointed out, doing things like that means you trust the MUC
>>service.
>>    
>>
>
>How so?  It should be possible to send symmetrically encrypted messages and 
>negotiate session keys without the MUC service knowing the keys.
>  
>
What you're proposing does not require the MUC service to do the 
encryption? Could you provide an outline of how you think it should work?

- Nolan



More information about the Standards mailing list