[Standards-JIG] The Third Great Encryption Thread

Hal Rottenberg halr9000 at gmail.com
Sat Apr 15 14:52:22 UTC 2006


Discuss.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Nolan Eakins <sneakin at semanticgap.com>
Date: Apr 15, 2006 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Members] and another thing...
To: JSF members discussion list <members at jabber.org>


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> As someone once said, there are more S/MIME implementations than there
> are S/MIME users. At least Jabber client developers are not adding to
> that mess. :-)
>
>>> We need a new "encryption thread".
>
> Always a blast!

The OTR JEP defines a lot for a JEP. A little to much IMO. If I recall,
there are still some parts that are open for discussion in it. There's
also MUC, pub/sub, Jingle, etc. that need workable encryption schemes
defined.

- - Nolan



--
Psi webmaster (http://psi-im.org)
im:hal at jabber.rocks.cc
http://halr9000.com



More information about the Standards mailing list