[Standards-JIG] MUC (JEP-45) privacy & control
trejkaz at trypticon.org
Mon Apr 17 03:51:12 UTC 2006
On Sunday 16 April 2006 22:38, Ian Paterson wrote:
> *The only cases where anonymous/semi-anonymous rooms make any sense to
> me is for members-only rooms where the user would not be able to enter
> using a different JID unless invited by an admin. In this case a simple
> optional protocol could be developed to allow a user to contact the room
> server with their primary JID and ask the server to treat the user's
> 'anonymous' JID as if it were the primary. Although that would reduce
> the level of anonymity for members-only rooms to the level provided by
> anonymous rooms today, clients would be much more simple since they
> would not have to worry about anonymous and semi-anonymous rooms.
Well, it's true... we could just remove anonymous and semi-anonymous rooms.
But if we did, we'd have a very hard time trying to convince many users of
IRC to switch to Jabber, as their service would offer that feature while ours
Also note that on IRC, nick registration and anonymised addresses are two
orthogonal features. You can't use one to provide the other, but both are
useful in isolation.
Email: trejkaz at trypticon.org
Jabber ID: trejkaz at trypticon.org
Web site: http://trypticon.org/
GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Standards