[Standards-JIG] Re: PEP and Pubsub Questions

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Mon Apr 17 17:15:10 UTC 2006

Hash: SHA1

Alexander Gnauck wrote:
> Hi,
>> See above, I'm not a big fan of batch deletion. I'd prefer to make that
>> operation atomic. We don't allow batch publishing, why allow batch
>> deletion? I've provisionally changed the scheme to reflect that.
> i think publishing and deletion are 2 totally different things. Compare
> it with Email. I think the most people delete old email periodically. So
> what they do is go thru all emails, mark them all and delete them all at
> the same time. Which is a batch process for me. Same with NNTP, if a
> newsserver keeps the messages for e.g 6 month, then it will delete old
> messages in a batch process.
> And why not send all the event notifications in one message stanza? This
> will save lots of bandwidth.

BTW, I added an implementation note about batch processing here:


I've relaxed my stance on batch processing -- sometimes it is a good
thing, but I think that "client" developers (note: these might not be IM
clients at all!) need to be aware of the potential problems with it
(e.g., "last published item" is meaningless if you batch publish).


- --
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation

Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3641 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060417/bbaec370/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list