[Standards-JIG] MUC (JEP-45) privacy & control

Ian Paterson ian.paterson at clientside.co.uk
Mon Apr 17 18:36:31 UTC 2006

> > In general the solution to this sort of problem is not to
> > reduce functionality, but rather to move the filtering to the 
> > server. In this case, perhaps it could be moved to the MUC
> > component.
> Yes. If MUC servers implemented that feature then people 
> would have the same possibility to block as they do with 
> nonanonymous rooms.

Sorry Trejkaz, what I meant by that was:

"Yes you're right, servers are the right place to block. Although, even
if MUC servers implemented that feature, they would not be able to block
any more messages than a client can already block from nonanonymous

- Ian

More information about the Standards mailing list