[Standards-JIG] Re: WHACK

Justin Karneges justin-keyword-jabber.093179 at affinix.com
Tue Apr 25 22:44:24 UTC 2006

On Tuesday 25 April 2006 15:12, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> The stanza acking proposal introduces at
> least one new top-level element, and that is a non-starter because it
> would break things.

I thought adding top-level elements was allowed, if they are not meant to be 
routable and only pertain to the stream.  See Stream Compression for an 
example of new elements being added.


More information about the Standards mailing list