[Standards-JIG] Re: WHACK

Richard Dobson richard at dobson-i.net
Thu Apr 27 16:43:44 UTC 2006


> point that I'd like to share...
>
> Whatever solution gets agreed upon, if it can be implemented outside
> of an xmpp server, it would be excellent.  For example, the server has
> a proxy in front of it that can be added/removed on a need basis. 
> This proxy would possibly re-write the stanzas and add info regarding
> sequence numbers/whacks, etc and forward it to the client.  It will
> also take care of tracking the whacks/acks etc and return an error
> stanza to the server if delivery is assumed failed.
>
>   
Not sure why you would want to do this but I cant see why you couldn't 
so long as to the client your proxy simply appears to be the xmpp server 
itself without it having to do anything special.

Richard





More information about the Standards mailing list