Fwd: [Standards-JIG] Re: WHACK

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Thu Apr 27 22:58:03 UTC 2006

On Thu Apr 27 23:51:28 2006, Matthew Wild wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Matthew Wild <mwild1 at gmail.com>
> Date: Apr 27, 2006 11:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [Standards-JIG] Re: WHACK
> To: Jabber protocol discussion list <standards-jig at jabber.org>
> Wouldn't Richard's suggestion solve the same problem, with easier
> implementation?
I don't think so, because it's not solving the problem.

It does solve a different problem - that of what to do when you 
cannot reconnect (or the client does not reconnect) within a 
reasonable timeframe. Then, treating them as if they'd been received 
when the client was offline seems like a good plan.

           You see things; and you say "Why?"
   But I dream things that never were; and I say "Why not?"
    - George Bernard Shaw

More information about the Standards mailing list