OT: series (was Re: [Standards-JIG] Re: WHACK)
trejkaz at trypticon.org
Fri Apr 28 15:15:45 UTC 2006
On Friday 28 April 2006 22:04, Dave Cridland wrote:
> > 1) Monotonically increasing rid values from initial rid.
> That's "strictly monotonically increasing". I've never actually seen
> a purpose to the word "monotonically", but apparently mathematicians
> love it.
In this context it is indeed redundant because a series cannot be strictly
increasing and not monotonically increasing. It is possible however, to have
increasing series which are not monotonically increasing (for example,
And of course the original suggestion of "monotonically increasing" would
permit the series 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1... not terribly useful, no.
Email: trejkaz at trypticon.org
Jabber ID: trejkaz at trypticon.org
Web site: http://trypticon.org/
GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Standards