Fwd: [Standards-JIG] Re: WHACK

Richard Dobson richard at dobson-i.net
Fri Apr 28 15:17:06 UTC 2006


> I don't think so, because it's not solving the problem.
>
> It does solve a different problem - that of what to do when you cannot 
> reconnect (or the client does not reconnect) within a reasonable 
> timeframe. Then, treating them as if they'd been received when the 
> client was offline seems like a good plan. 
Why do you want to add this level of complexity in though? as it seems 
pretty pointless as far as I can see and adds significantly to the 
complexity of implementing the server.

Richard





More information about the Standards mailing list