[Standards-JIG] iq for ibb
machekku at uaznia.net
Tue Dec 5 23:19:06 UTC 2006
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
>> Mridul wrote:
>>> Since iq has also been introduced for ibb recently
>>> is there any way for client to declare that they prefer or support one
>>> over other ? None of the older clients are going to understand iq ibb
>>> stanzas for example : same for servers.
>> Other idea to solve this at the implementation level:
>> If I try sending iq, but other peer doesn't support them, it returns
>> feature-not-implemented. Then I can retry sending a message.
> Well a good XMPP application should already return such an error (either
> feature-not-implemented or service-unavailable). That's why IQ is so
> nice. :-)
Yes, I know, and that's how my solution works: Everyone implementing new
version of the XEP should be prepared to get this error and treat is as
"please switch to messages".
Maciek A: It's against natural order of reading.
xmpp:machekku at uaznia.net Q: Why is that?
xmpp:machekku at chrome.pl A: People answering above quoted text.
Q: What's the most annoying on newsgroups?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 257 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Standards