[Standards-JIG] In order delivery for xep-0047 ?

Matthias Wimmer m at tthias.eu
Thu Dec 7 15:21:21 UTC 2006


Mridul schrieb:
>
> In order processing is required - which need not translate into in 
> order delivery.
> And which does not actually translate in case there is heavy load if 
> using async sockets.

IMHO delivering messages is part of processing a message. Not delivering 
messages in-order has been considered a bug for a long time.

If you are binding a XMPP stream on a transport protocol, that does not 
guarantee in-order delivery by itself, your binding would have to ensure 
the reordering.


Tot kijk
    Matthias



More information about the Standards mailing list