[Standards-JIG] Privacy lists: changing active and default list atthe same time
jd.conley at coversant.net
Thu Dec 7 18:27:39 UTC 2006
AFAIK the only restriction in IQ related is you can only have sub-element. If your multi-operations do not lead to more than one sub element, then you're good to go. We do this in MUC for mass affiliation changes and such.
From: standards-jig-bounces at jabber.org [mailto:standards-jig-bounces at jabber.org] On Behalf Of Mridul
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 10:25 AM
Remko Tronçon wrote:
>> In my implementation of the privacy lists I do not allow this, but when
>> I checked RFC 3921, I noticed that it is not clear if this is allowed.
>> While it is no usecase to change both at the same time, the above
>> request conforms the schemas.
> I seem to recall a similar discussion on 'batch roster changes', and
> it was concluded that only one operation was allowed in an IQ.
This is really interesting - somehow I always was under the impression
that a iq stanza can contain only a single query.
Maybe I assumed this since otherwise there would not be an easy way to
correlate partial failure of an iq.
More information about the Standards