[Standards-JIG] proto-JEP: Best Practices for Implementation ofSASL ANONYMOUS

Andrew Brunner abrunner at cybercreek.com
Fri Feb 3 17:57:45 UTC 2006


>From an implementation point of view: If I were to support Anonymous users I
would support them in both cases.   I would just make it an option for
administration.

--------------------------
Andrew Brunner
CyberCreek LLC
http://www.cybercreek.com/

Phone: 919.957.7279


-----Original Message-----
From: standards-jig-bounces at jabber.org
[mailto:standards-jig-bounces at jabber.org]On Behalf Of Mickael Remond
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:40 PM
To: Jabber protocol discussion list
Subject: Re: [Standards-JIG] proto-JEP: Best Practices for
Implementation ofSASL ANONYMOUS


* JEP Editor <editor at jabber.org> [2006-01-24 23:42:10 -0600]:

> The JEP Editor has received a proposal for a new JEP.
>
> Title: Best Practices for Implementation of SASL ANONYMOUS
>
> Abstract: This document specifies best practices for implementation of
> the SASL ANONYMOUS mechanism in the context of client authentication
> with an XMPP server.

I have a question regarding implementation practices: does it make sense
to allow to mix anonymous temporary users and named users on the same
virtual host ?
This is an open question, as I have a mixed feeling about this question.

Thank you,

--
Mickaël Rémond
 http://www.process-one.net/





More information about the Standards mailing list