[Standards-JIG] Multiple groups question.

Joe Hildebrand hildjj at gmail.com
Sun Feb 5 02:55:11 UTC 2006


While we're at it, if we're comparing group names, particularly with  
the new stuff in PEP, shouldn't we have a stringprep profile for  
canonicalizing them?  I'd suggest ResourcePrep is probably what is  
needed.


On Feb 3, 2006, at 4:10 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Etan Reisner wrote:
>
>> Can this get put into writing somewhere? Even just as a suggestion  
>> for
>> clients in 0162 would be useful.
>
> I've updated this:
>
> http://www.xmpp.org/xmppbis.html#roster
>
> Peter
>
> - --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> Jabber Software Foundation
> http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFD4+LsNF1RSzyt3NURApsGAJ9KfKxzqSE7w7TgJQ5Qe5bP3M6wqQCgpmOb
> iQDQVHHnw1ALw/GlH1RCJHY=
> =rW8A
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1883 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060204/561f54af/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list