[Standards-JIG] Multiple groups question.

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Mon Feb 6 18:32:12 UTC 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yes, applying Resourceprep seems correct. We don't need another
stringprep profile for this, I think. I'll update the xmppbis page
appropriately.

Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> While we're at it, if we're comparing group names, particularly with the
> new stuff in PEP, shouldn't we have a stringprep profile for
> canonicalizing them?  I'd suggest ResourcePrep is probably what is needed.
> 
> 
> On Feb 3, 2006, at 4:10 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
> Etan Reisner wrote:
> 
>>>> Can this get put into writing somewhere? Even just as a suggestion for
>>>> clients in 0162 would be useful.
> 
> I've updated this:
> 
> http://www.xmpp.org/xmppbis.html#roster
> 
> Peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD55YsNF1RSzyt3NURArtJAKDnNyfWVi3QAFT7hvlHCCfnqMa1SgCg6/BC
iWCjIa29Ae7I12Y9k6dsxBI=
=bX56
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3641 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060206/d919f9cc/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list