[Standards-JIG] Jingle vs. Zoep
dgriffioen at voipster.com
Thu Feb 9 16:30:35 UTC 2006
Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2006, at 2:28 AM, dirk.griffioen at voipster.com wrote:
>> However, there is one big difference: Zoep does not try to xmpp-ify
>> SIP, it just wraps it. So there is no need for invention :-) or own
>> extensions: you need a simple SIP stack (of which many exists,
>> either open or not): parser + statemachine to get up and running.
> Actually, I'll take issue with this. We haven't found any free
> (either beer or speech) SIP stacks that don't have fatal flaws in
> terms of memory leaks or mis-implementations of the protocol. I'd
> love to have pointers to some more that we haven't looked at, if you
> have suggestions, however.
Well, of course there is the Openzoep SIP stack :)
No but seriously, I do understand what you are saying: we looked at a
lot of SIP stacks too (mostly the ones in
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Open+Source+VOIP+Software), but they
often go into directions you describe or are diffecult to use because
they are embedded in a larger application (and/or use other libraries
from that application - but this could be handled, if given time.)
One library I liked very much because it was small and well designed is
The author is very friendly and happy to discuss features, enhancements etc.
And of course there are commercial SIP stacks (either available as
library or not), of which I cannot say anything, since I did not have
the opportunity to try them out.
More information about the Standards