Jingle P2P (was Re: [Standards-JIG] Jingle vs. Zoep)

Scott Ludwig scottlu at google.com
Thu Feb 9 21:01:58 UTC 2006


On 2/9/06, Justin Karneges <justin-keyword-jabber.093179 at affinix.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 09 February 2006 10:34, Scott Ludwig wrote:
> > high quality p2p implementation. This simple facility can be the basis
> > for many new p2p session types. For example, if you look at
> > libjingle-0.2.0 which was just released, another session type was just
> > added: a tunnel session for creating reliable TCP like streams between
> > peers over p2p.
>
> This is all well and good for libjingle, but will we see some JEPs?  Both the
> relay and psuedotcp protocols are still mysteries.

We need to see JEP detail on relay, candidate allocation, STUN
connectivity establishment state machines. These aren't in the JEP
yet.

> Also, ICE supports "real" TCP, where does that fit in?  Or does it?

It's present in the current JEP and libjingle. ICE supports TCP as a
way to achieve connectivity (some network environments have tight UDP
restrictions).



More information about the Standards mailing list