[Standards-JIG] RE: Standards-JIG Digest, Vol 25, Issue 34

Jean-Louis Seguineau jean-louis.seguineau at laposte.net
Fri Feb 10 21:49:16 UTC 2006

Good points Akito ;)

Let me just tell you why Jingle to SIP is important. Because you make money
on voice calls, and not on emails. This is the single most important revenue
source of the telecom era. And it is not likely to change. The actors will
change; the technology will change, but not the cow to milk ;)


-----Original Message-----
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:35:39 -0800
From: Akito Nozaki <anpluto at usa.net>
Subject: Re: [Standards-JIG] Jingle vs. Zoep
To: Jabber protocol discussion list <standards-jig at jabber.org>
Message-ID: <43ECF91B.60902 at usa.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Scott Ludwig wrote:
> On 2/9/06, Akito Nozaki <anpluto at usa.net> wrote:
>>> The gateway remark is the most interesting, as Max implemented both the
Openzoep SIP stack as wel as a Gateway to bridge incoming SIP to XMPP.
>>> I know there have been discussion on the list about a Jingle/Sip
gateway, I would like to know if there is anyone that actually has
implemented one? And if so, is it possible to share some of the gained
> We're committed to ensuring that Jingle gateways to SIP. We're working
> through issues and will contribute to a JEP on SIP<->Jingle
> gatewaying.
> .

The introduction says it wants to provide a easy way for VOIP gateway to
talk XMPP, but why are we doing this? To make people happy?

XMPP protocol was not implemented based on AIM/ICQ, MSN, Yahoo protocol,
but got ideas from it. Why is Jingle<->SIP gateway so important but
gateway to these IM network wasn't as important?


More information about the Standards mailing list