[Standards-JIG] Jingle: DTMF
ogorman at gmail.com
Tue Feb 14 23:23:42 UTC 2006
but this isnt always something you can do early, it is a realtime event, end
user presses one so that the other end can send you on in the ivr. however i
dont see how you could have them come out of order as the other end is most
likely waiting for said dtmf
On 2/14/06, Jean-Louis Seguineau <jean-louis.seguineau at laposte.net> wrote:
> There is certainly no guarantee that separate stanzas will reach their
> target in the proper order. But we may just group entire DTMF tone
> in one single stanza. Then we have a better chance to get them in the
> <iq from=' juliet at capulet.com' to='voicemail.shakespeare.lit'
> <jingle xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/jingle'
> initiator='romeo at montague.net/orchard'
> <dtmf xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/jingle/info/audio'>
> <tone code='1234'/>
> <tone code='5678' duration=100'/>
> -----Original Message-----
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:19:03 -0500
> From: "Simon Guindon" <simon.guindon at tomahawk.ca>
> Subject: RE: [Standards-JIG] Jingle: DTMF
> To: "Jabber protocol discussion list" <standards-jig at jabber.org>
> Message-ID: <3E6F9E04F4CF864DBCC3EECB90FDFB502DA269 at BART>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> I'm an advocate of doing it over XMPP because I think this makes the
> Jingle gateway more flexible, especially in the sense of other protocols
> that may not support DTMF, which allows the jabber client to still
> navigate IVR's.
> One example comes to mind, lets pretend protocol X gets a jingle
> gateway, and there is a voicemail service running on the server. Even a
> non-DTMF capable protocol can now navigate IVR's.
> On the flip side, I get a bit skeptical as well after thinking a bit
> about Joe's thoughts. Can the INFO packets ever come out of order?
> Also on the flip side.What in the case of a sip phone calling this
> jingle gateway to check voicemail. The jingle gateway will need to
> handle SIP's DTMF and pass the INFO messages to the voicemail "server
> component" which speaks Jingle.
> What are everyones thoughts? I hope I was clear what I was meaning to
> get across.
> Thanks and take care,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards