[Standards-JIG] Jingle: DTMF

Simon Guindon simon.guindon at tomahawk.ca
Wed Feb 15 17:07:07 UTC 2006


I agree. If its true that XMPP delivers in order then receiving in order
is not an issue and all I see that remains is latency.
 
Take care,
Simon
 
-------------------------------------------------------
Simon Guindon
Tomahawk Technologies Inc.
simon.guindon at tomahawk.ca
www.tomahawk.ca
-------------------------------------------------------
 

________________________________

From: standards-jig-bounces at jabber.org
[mailto:standards-jig-bounces at jabber.org] On Behalf Of Matthew O'Gorman
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 12:03 PM
To: Jabber protocol discussion list
Subject: Re: [Standards-JIG] Jingle: DTMF


this in my opinion is yet another reason not to do rfc2833 as jabber
already provides a straight forward and reliable path for this data.


On 2/15/06, Justin Karneges < justin-keyword-jabber.093179 at affinix.com
<mailto:justin-keyword-jabber.093179 at affinix.com> > wrote: 

	Hi,
	
	This is not true.  See XMPP-Core, Section 10: 
	
	"Compliant server implementations MUST ensure in-order
processing of XML
	stanzas between any two entities."
	
	-Justin
	
	On Wednesday 15 February 2006 00:10, Jean-Louis Seguineau wrote:
	> Simon, the simple answer to this is yes it is possible for
stanza to be out 
	> of order. XMPP does not 'guarantee' the ordered delivery of
stanzas. Even
	> if they are in order most of the time, we should not assume it
to be always
	> true.
	


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060215/00d75ec1/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list