[Standards-JIG] Jingle: DTMF - Zoep

Thomas Charron twaffle at gmail.com
Thu Feb 16 20:38:09 UTC 2006

On 2/16/06, Joe Beda <jbeda at google.com> wrote:
> I would think that any data could be sent in an 'info'.  If the other side
> doesn't understand it then it can just ignore it or return an error.
> Similarly, I would assume that extra elements could be included in other
> jingle stanzas.  If you want to signal the ability to do other types of
> signalling in the context of a session it seems reasonable to do so in the
> initiate/accept.
> A DTMF protocol could be negotiated (and renegotiated) in this way without
> impacting the core jingle-audio spec.  That being said, it may still make
> sense to include DTMF over XMPP in jingle-audio anyway.

  *cheer*  Exactly.  Why some people in other threads want to insert rfc2833
directly into the JEP I have no clue.

> As for rfc2833, the ability to send/receive RTP in this format should be
> specified with a payload-type of 'audio/telephone-event'.

  Hrm.  Good point.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060216/a6e6a106/attachment.html>

More information about the Standards mailing list