[Standards-JIG] Re: JEP-112 (User Physical Geolocation): Extra URL field

Ralph Meijer jabber.org at ralphm.ik.nu
Sat Feb 18 15:24:16 UTC 2006

On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 06:05:34PM +0100, Remko Troncon wrote:
> On 05 Feb 2006, at 16:42, Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
> >I think there is an example with jabber:x:oob in geoloc JEP. Why  
> >not to
> >do the same with this one?
> There is indeed an example where a regular message is sent with an  
> oob element. And i see that a <url> was removed from the physloc JEP  
> in the past, because of jabber:x:oob. However, it's not clear to me  
> why a historical namespace would be used in a standards-track jep,  
> nor how this fits into the JEP.

Well, for me this not a problem. Historic doesn't mean that it is



More information about the Standards mailing list