[Standards-JIG] Re: MUC traffic issues
us at activestocks.de
Sun Feb 19 19:38:30 UTC 2006
Alexander Gnauck schrieb:
> Alexander Gnauck schrieb:
>> Hal Rottenberg schrieb:
>>> MUC Multicasting.
>> yes, but not only muc. Pubsub and other protocols will have the same
>> problems once the are commonly used.
> oh, here is what we need here:
> i should read all Jeps more carefully ;-)
> Any server there supporting this Jep yet?
Well, that does not work good for large chat rooms, the delivered
messages would become ULTRA big. I still think the xmpp protocol is very
verbose and a diet could be good for it, but that's my personal opinion.
( I still like the approach to slim out "iq" by "i", "presence" by "p"
and "message" by "m"), but don't listen to me on the last topic.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 329 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Standards