[Standards-JIG] Re: MUC traffic issues

Ulrich Staudinger us at activestocks.de
Sun Feb 19 19:38:30 UTC 2006

Alexander Gnauck schrieb:

> Alexander Gnauck schrieb:
>> Hal Rottenberg schrieb:
>>> MUC Multicasting.
>> yes, but not only muc. Pubsub and other protocols will have the same 
>> problems once the are commonly used.
> oh, here is what we need here:
> http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0033.html
> i should read all Jeps more carefully ;-)
> Any server there supporting this Jep yet?

Well, that does not work good for large chat rooms, the delivered 
messages would become ULTRA big. I still think the xmpp protocol is very 
verbose and a diet could be good for it, but that's my personal opinion. 
( I still like the approach to slim out "iq" by "i", "presence" by "p" 
and "message" by "m"), but don't listen to me on the last topic.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: us.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 329 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060219/6f307ddb/attachment.vcf>

More information about the Standards mailing list