[Standards-JIG] Re: MUC traffic issues
us at activestocks.de
Sun Feb 19 19:41:49 UTC 2006
Ulrich Staudinger schrieb:
> Alexander Gnauck schrieb:
> Well, that does not work good for large chat rooms, the delivered
> messages would become ULTRA big. I still think the xmpp protocol is
> very verbose and a diet could be good for it, but that's my personal
> opinion. ( I still like the approach to slim out "iq" by "i",
> "presence" by "p" and "message" by "m"), but don't listen to me on the
> last topic.
Anyway, with that jep at least the messages would not be delivered two
hundred times for rooms with 200 participients....
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 329 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Standards