[Standards-JIG] MUC/pubsub multicasting using JEP-0033. Was: MUC traffic issues

Ulrich Staudinger us at activestocks.de
Mon Feb 20 21:01:45 UTC 2006

Ralph Meijer schrieb:

>On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 08:57:30PM +0100, Ulrich Staudinger wrote:
>>    I don't see how this is different from an integrated MUC implementation
>>    using the current protocol. Replacing MUC's distribution scheme with
>>    pubsub's doesn't change anything. You'll still have as many messages
>>    coming into to the server (now as publishes) and the notifications
>>    coming out are also similar.
>>Actually, in the case of ejabberd where pubsub is built into the server you
>>have only one notification coming into the server and in the former scenario,
>>50 messages coming out.
>So, as I said, this also holds if you integrate MUC into the server. No
>need to drag pubsub into this.
Yeah, but what do you do when you have ten connection servers and you 
want users from all ten connection servers joining one particular room 
on one of the servers ?
That's where a pubsub like approach makes sense.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060220/d79f0f95/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: us.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 329 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20060220/d79f0f95/attachment.vcf>

More information about the Standards mailing list