[Standards-JIG] Re: MUC/pubsub multicasting using JEP-0033. Was:MUC traffic issues
us at activestocks.de
Thu Feb 23 20:17:43 UTC 2006
Alexander Gnauck schrieb:
>>> Cool, that's what I was looking for.
>>> So there are already three protocols (presence, MUC, PubSub) where S2S
>>> bandwidth is being wasted in a more or less identical fashion. Fix
>>> fix the rest for free. :-)
>> I agree! I still like the broadcast alias address idea I presented.
>> Perhaps I could write up a proto-jep with the help of someone who knows
>> PubSub. Any takers? This thread seems to have died...
> Hi JD,
> this would be very cool. We should not let die this thread. This is a
> very important issue in the current XMPP protocol IMHO.
> If we want to see huge XMPP servers then we need a intelligent
> broadcasting for all "one -> many protocols" (now MUC and Pubsub) and
> s2s. More bandwith, and bigger servers are *no* solution here if we
> can reduce the traffic 1000% and more with a small protocol extension
> for broadcasting.
Thanks guys, i fully agree that we need a way to fix this.
I will be happy to comment.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 329 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Standards